Walla - Emotion Model
The Walla Emotion Model, proposed by Peter Walla, is a conceptual framework that aims to clarify and distinguish between terms often used interchangeably in emotion research: affective processing, feelings, and emotions. It emphasizes a clear separation of these concepts and highlights the distinct roles of different brain regions in their generation and experience.
Here are the core tenets of the Walla Emotion Model:
Affective Processing as Unconscious Neural Activity:
- Walla posits that "affective processing" refers to the initial, rapid, and often unconscious neural activity that evaluates stimuli in terms of their relevance and valence (pleasantness/unpleasantness) and arousal (intensity).
- This processing is thought to occur primarily in older, subcortical brain structures (like the amygdala and insula), which are shared with more primitive vertebrates.
- It's a foundational, automatic evaluation that guides initial behavioral tendencies (e.g., approach or withdrawal).
Feelings as Conscious Bodily Responses:
- "Feelings," in this model, are defined as the conscious, subjective experience of these bodily responses that result from affective processing.
- These are the internal sensations and physiological changes we become aware of, such as a racing heart, sweaty palms, or a sense of warmth.
- They are the "what it's like" of an emotional state, but are still distinct from the outward expression.
Emotions as Behavioral Outputs (Communication):
- "Emotions" are understood as the behavioral outputs or expressions that communicate feelings to others.
- These include facial expressions (like a scared face or a smile), vocalizations, body language, and other observable actions.
- Crucially, according to Walla, emotions are not the processing itself, nor are they the conscious internal feeling. Instead, they are the means by which an individual signals their internal state to the external world. For example, fear is not an emotion, but a feeling; the scared face is the emotion.
Key Distinctions and Implications:
- Subcortical vs. Cortical: The model emphasizes that affective processing is largely subcortical and evolved prior to more complex cognitive (cortical) processing. This suggests that our initial, gut reactions are driven by these older brain systems.
- Cognition and Affect Separation (initially): While acknowledging that cognition and affect interact, Walla's model proposes that affective processing can occur independently and even precede cognitive understanding.
- Challenging Traditional Definitions: This model directly challenges the common interchangeable use of "affect," "emotion," and "feeling" in everyday language and even in some scientific contexts. It aims to provide a more precise and neurobiologically grounded set of definitions.
- Applications: This model has implications for various fields, including neuroscience, psychology, marketing (understanding consumer reactions), and human-computer interaction (designing systems that account for emotional responses). By distinguishing between the different levels of emotional phenomena, researchers can design more targeted studies and interventions.
In essence, the Walla Emotion Model provides a hierarchical view of emotional experience, starting from unconscious brain activity, leading to conscious bodily sensations, and finally manifesting as observable behaviors that convey those sensations.

the smile is the emotion
The human self
My research on self-referential processing in the brain, primarily using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), contributes to a "multiple aspect theory of the self."1 My work challenges the idea of a singular, monolithic "self" in the brain, suggesting instead that the human self is dynamic and comprises at least two distinct, serially processed aspects.
Here's a summary of my key findings and propositions:
1. Two Serial Aspects of the Self (Me1 and Me2):
- Early Processing (Me1 - "Non-personal" or "We" Self): At an early cortical processing stage (around 200 ms post-stimulus onset), we found that the brain differentiates between stimuli that have any personal reference (e.g., "my garden," "his garden") and those that have no personal reference (e.g., "a garden"). Crucially, at this early stage, self-related stimuli ("my") are processed similarly to other-related stimuli ("his"). This early effect, referred to as "Me1," is hypothesized to represent a more primitive, "non-personal" self or a sense of "we" – a general engagement with personally relevant information, but not yet distinguishing between "me" and "you." This early processing is observed in left occipito-parietal regions.
- Later Processing (Me2 - "Personal" or "Distinct" Self): At a later processing stage (around 400 ms post-stimulus onset), brain activity patterns elicited by self-related stimuli ("my garden") significantly diverge from both other-related stimuli ("his garden") and non-personal stimuli ("a garden"). This later effect, termed "Me2," is thought to represent the "proper self" – the distinct and differentiated self that is unique from others. This later processing occurs over left fronto-temporal areas.
2. Dynamic and Hierarchical Processing:
- This research emphasizes that self-referential processing is not a single, instantaneous event, but a dynamic and hierarchical process. The brain first processes information as generally relevant to a "self" or "us" (Me1) before refining that processing to distinguish one's own self from others (Me2). This aligns with very early philosophical ideas about separate self-aspects, such as William James's distinction between the "Me" (the empirical self, what is known about oneself) and the "I" (the pure ego, the knower).
In essence, my work tells us that the human self is not a simple, fixed entity but a complex, dynamically constructed phenomenon in the brain, processed in a hierarchical fashion from a more general, "non-personal" engagement to a highly individualized and distinct sense of self over time.
